Media, particularly newspapers, is considered to be one of the most effective ship canal of educating the general public on current events going on well-nigh them. However, when an accident happens that strikes the interest of the world as a whole, it is evident that the news articles produced in the distinguishable regions will differ. This is non to presuppose that the diversity is found within the facts of the paper, as there isnt some(prenominal) question as to the specifics of the affair. Instead, the discrepancies are found in how the incident is presented. On June 13, 2003, radioactive material was found in a taxi in central Tbilisi, Georgia. This caused much guesswork around the world with concerns arising regarding who it belonged to, and what it was to be used for. Three newspapers, The capital of Thailand Post, The San Francisco Chronicle, and the Agence France Presse, were a few who chose to report on this business relationship, all by means of an arms-length p erspective. Each outlined the event in a diametric way, with some putting much emphasis on the facts alone, and others relating it to the greater, and to a greater extent alarming issue of terrorism. The impact these biases have on the drool are evident in all 3 newspapers, alteration the final thought of the reader towards the occurrence.
The first article presented, Agence France Presse short states the progression of the event, non focusing on the danger of the filthy conk out or the need for concern towards it. This article did not go into depth, only mentioning the materials found in the taxi and the possibl e relation to terrorist activity. Whats uniq! ue to this piece is the short description of what the bomb could lead to: a low intensity blast adapted of spreading toxic nuclear waste (Agence France Presse). This short post-horse furthers the... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment