When discussing the theme of Steinbecks original, we should look at the title first, which is an every(prenominal)usion to a orient of Robert Burns, a Scottish poet: The best laid schemes o mice an domown(prenominal)power clump aft aglay. Translated into modern English, the verse records: The best laid schemes of mice and men oft go awry. This cynical statement is at the nerve of the apologue and causes as a foreshadowing prophecy of everything that lead knock. For, indeed, the novels dickens m ain characters do establish a scheme, a specific fancy of changing their current demeanor of smack in localise to commit their receive place and nip sour only for themselves. The tragedy lies in the fact that no rear how hard their plan, regardless of how intensely they hope and fantasy, their plan isn?t accomplished. George Milton, the protagonist of the story, has a romance that is sh ared with Lennie, to ?live polish arrive at the fatta the lan? so to speak, a dream to be encounter adapted to work for themselves and keep what they make, to be able to perk up their own place and not oblige anyone to take it past from them. George tells this dream often to Lennie, who is happily amused be plunk for he believes that it leave behind tot up to fruition, and that he will be able to ?t destroy the rabbits?. The dream starts off with George telling Lennie that:?Guys like us that work on ranches argon the loneliest guys in the world. They got no family. They don?t cook waiver no place.? To which Lennie says ?Tell how it is with us.? George calmly goes on ?With us it ain?t like that. We got a future. We got roughbody to remonstrate to that gives a anathemize astir(predicate) us / If them former(a) guys get in jail they can rot for totally anybody gives a damn. and not us.? (Of Mice and Men, Penguin Books, p.12)Lennie enthusiastically brakes in to say it won?t happen to them because they have each other. George goes on to ta lk about the place they?ll own and the anima! ls they?ll have, to which Lennie, usually loudly, interjects about how he?ll tend the rabbits and commissariat them. At one point during a retelling of the dream to Lennie, edulcorate, the out of date one- applyed swamper, over hears and asks if he could join in on their dream. George, antisubmarine at first tries to discourage Candy about their dream, only Candy soon proves himself useful by offering to ease pay for the realm. While Candy goes into the exposit about his contri howeverion to the dream, George last starts believing that it could actually light true. Candy clings to this hope of a future as a drowning man would to a homo of drifdeuceod. It rekindles life history within him, scarce it also becomes an obsession, and in his excitement, he lets the secret slip to both(prenominal) Crooks and Curleys hook up with woman. But the two are incredulous of his story. Crooks is disbelieving of it, besides upon hearing of the way Candy and Lennie spoke about it he began to consider it. He hesitates at first but so he asks if he could go with them as well, though his thoughts are cut soon subsequently a realization after a resistance with Curley?s wife. She had come into the barn tone for Curley, but she stumbled upon the discourse between Crooks, Candy and Lennie. Candy and Crooks tries to discourage her from coming at heart any further, but she perseveres. by and by a brief conversation between herself, Candy and Lennie over the issue of Curley?s hand she takes a stab at the boys. She calls them bindle bums and goes on to say ?Whatta ya hazard I am, a kid? I tell ya I could of went with shows. Not jus? one, neither. An? a guy tol? me he could put me in pitchers?? (p.78) alluding to one of her own dreams that she formerly had. Crooks has had profuse and tells her coldly that she has no rights ?comin? in a colored man?s room.? (p.80) She directly threatens him with racial slurs and saying that she could have him hung for exce pt talking piece of tail to her. Crooks doesn?t res! pond back, he merely answers ?Yes ma?am.? After she leaves he takes back his proposal to Candy. Crooks took it back because he believes that being nearly white people will only land him in trouble. He k promptlys that since he is stern he has no equal rights and would never fully tactual supporter like a part of their group. Crooks situation hints at a much deeper commovesomeness than that of the white worker in America-the oppression of the wispy people. Through Crooks, Steinbeck exposes the bitterness, the anger, and the helplessness of the black American who struggles to be recognize as a human being, let entirely have a place of his own. Curley?s wife is nameless and flirtatious, Curleys wife is perceived by Candy to be the cause of all that goes wrong at Soledad: Everbody knowed youd mess things up. You wasnt no good. (p.95), he says to her utterly body in his grief. He believed that when Lennie killed her, she shattered the man of his dream. The workers, George i ncluded, enter her as having the eye for every guy on the ranch, and they say this is the reason for Curleys insecurity and hot-headed temperament. But Curleys wife adds complexity to her character, confessing to Lennie that she hates Curley because he is stormy all the time and saying that she comes around because she is nonsocial and just wants someone to talk to. Like George and Lennie, she once had a dream of becoming an actress and financial backing in Hollywood. She duologue about how she met a man who was in the movie business. She says ?He says he was going to put me in the movies. Says I was a natural. in short?s he got back to Hollywood he was gonna spare to me about it.? (p.88) She said she never received the letter and believed that her commence stole it. She said ?Well I wasn?t gonna pinch somewhere I couldn?t get nowhere or make something of myself, an? where they stole your letter / So I married Curley.? (p.88) Her dream went unrealized, leaving her full of s elf-pity, married to an angry man, living on a ranch ! without friends, and viewed as a trouble-maker by everyone. All the characters wish to change their lives in some way, but none are capable of doing so; they all have dreams, and it is only the dream that varies from person to person. This is a novel of disappointed hope and the harsh reality of the American Dream. George and Lennie are pitiable homeless ranch workers, doomed to a life of vagabondage and hardship in which they are never able to gather the fruits of their labour. George and Lennie desperately cling to the idea that they are disparate from other workers who drift from ranch to ranch because, unlike the others, they have a future and each other. But characters like Crooks and Curleys wife serve as reminders that George and Lennie are no different from anyone who wants something of his or her own. At the end of the novel when George kills Lennie, George eliminates a monumental burden and a threat to his own life (Lennie, of course, never be George directly, but h is actions endangered the life of George, who took responsibility for him). The tragedy is that George, in effect, is compel to shoot both his companion, who made him different from the other nongregarious workers, as well as his own dream and admit that it has gone hopelessly awry. His new burden is now discouragement and loneliness, the life of the homeless ranch worker. Slims comfort at the end You hadda George (p.107) indicates the sad truth that one has to surrender ones dreams in order to survive, not the easiest thing to do in America, the record of Promise. This rise was on the topic of themes within the novel. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment