Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD) Treatment Strategies

Anti cordial record Disorder (ASPD) sermon Strategies1. discourse OF ASPD BY PHARMACOLOGICAL MEANS preaching of unsociable nature rowdyism by pharmacological means is nonoriously difficult, mainly beca expend of the paradoxs with non-compliance due to the placement rears of the medication at doses high enough to produce a remediation response. A recent paper by Walker has claimed salient(ip) aftermaths from Quetiapine which trim down symptoms of irrit aptitude, impulsivity, and aggressiveness together with improvements in hostility and rage chemical reactions with borderline side effects and at that placefore good levels of compliance. We should note however, that this understand was in pornographics and there is little data on the effectiveness of this regime in children. (Walker C et al. 2003)A brief overview of the literature on the subject shows that there is huge controversy surrounding the argonas of goodyment ( both(prenominal) psych early(a)apeutic and phar macological) of the psychopathic and unsociable temper illnesss in general. They range from around (usu eithery the older texts) which suggest that the linguistic context is for the most(prenominal) spot untreatable (viz. Cleckley, H. 1964) to others which offer varying full stops of evidence of success. Critical analysis would befool to conclude however, that the different methods of manipulation that become been tried drive enormously suffered from a lose of controlled fol natural depression-up research and that comparison of trials is rendered difficult because of the deficiency of consistency in both the definition and the diagnosis of the put out. (Martens W H J 2000) in that respect does appear to be a general adoption in the literature that the core antisocial doingss associated with the antisocial character illness are difficult to manage (Myers W C et al. 2006) and that the bulk of pharmacological sermon is aimed at the control of the associated deportments. The main clinical dilemma which faces health care professionals is whether it is better to target the untreatable aspects of the condition, on the grounds that they are what usu in ally ca utilize to affected role to come into contact with the healthcare professionals in the first instance, or to treat the associated symptoms which whitethorn be much responsive to pharmacological intervention. (Hodgins S et al. 2007)With these caveats in place, if adept focuses on the treatment options most popularly employed in antisocial personality ailment, thence one do-nothing observe that the options clear be bigheartedly categorised as the neuroleptics, anticonvulsants, lithium, antidepressant drugs, psychostimulants and benzodiazepines.It should be noted that m all a(prenominal) of these medication categories go away typically take a substantial duration to exert optimal effect and compliance is frequently a problem rendering treatment judicial decision difficult .The treatment options will be considered by categoryNeurolepticsThis group typically cause a tranquillising effect of sick of(p) and aberrant demeanor patterns. Anger, hostility and tension levels can be landd by low dose regimes and this drug group and are as well as helpful in dealing with specific psychotic episodes, but in typically high doses. (Black, D. A. 2002)AnticonvulsantsThis category of medication is thought to ready a bite of actions on many of the neuropsychiatric syndromes, as well as the conductal distracts, in appendix to their direct anticonvuslant activity. (Hudziak J J et al. 2006)Carbamazepine has been plant to be helpful in situations of angry outbursts, self-mutilation and violence. It is postu recentd that it whitethorn work in this respect through its activity in the limbic system. There is besides electroencephalogram evidence of reduced abnormal activity in the EEG traces of the most explosively violent patients with antisocial personality disquiet. (Cowdry, R et al. 1998) lithiumLithium has in like manner been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of unrestrainedly volatile deportment patterns. It does have the drawback of producing clinical sedation at the higher ends of the healing(p) spectrum and may as well be associated with both tremor and lack of coordination. aeonian supervision is therefore essential and this may be difficult in an uncooperative patient. (Paris J 2005)AntidepressantsThe antisocial personality swage patient will often demonstrate mood disturbances which may be helped by the antidepressants. Children are not good candidates for some antidepressants, for example the MAOIs utilize in grown patients are not distract in the younger age group. imipramine has been ground useful in children who have panic attacks, mood swings and dysthymia and also in some obsessive children. The antidepressants tend to be used in clinical cases where lithium has failed. (Gunderson J G et al. 2006)Benzo diazepinesThese are perchance the most effective in the anxiety states and in cases of insomnia. Because of their fast approach of action, the Benzodiazepine group are useful in the acute behavioural disturbance, peculiar(prenominal)ly in aggression. Some studies have highlighted the downside of benzodiazepine treatment. This embroils not only the problems of habituation, but also the possibility of dysinhibitory effects in certain patients. Alprazolam is arguably one of the most effective agents in this curative area but its use is complicated by cases of serious dyscontrol. In some studies, episodes of drug overdoses and severe self-mutilation required the immediate withdrawal of the medication. (Frank E et al. 2002)PsychostimulantsThese are particularly useful in the younger patient where they are known to reduce symptoms of dysphoria and anxiety. There have been a number of well conducted trials in this area. Medications such as amphetamine and methylphenidate have prove d useful in reducing behavioural disturbances children, particularly when there is an overlap among antisocial personality complaint and attention shortage syndrome. (Turgay A et al. 2002)Some studies in this area have demonstrated good responses to both the tricyclic antidepressant group and the SSRI group, with fluoxitine appearing to be particularly favourable. The ruff studies however, do not claim a good response rate of higher than 27% in subjects with antisocial personality disorder. One should note also that some studies also record an apparent clinical worsening of their condition, with amitriptyline and haloperidol producing increased levels of both agression and hostility in some patients who did not exhibit these symptoms before treatment. The causal linkage was given unless assent when it was found that these symptoms increased with longer duration of treatment and increased superman of medication. (Tyrer P et al. 2004)In conclusion, one can ponder the writing of Tyrer and Bateman who have written extensively on the subject of pharmacology of the personality disorders. When considering an appropriate drug choice for antisocial personality disorders and others, they note that any genuine neurobiochemical disorder may actually not be central to the condition, and may even be part of the peripheral syndrome (drug clapperclaw etc,). to cite TyrerThe best that pharmacology and physiology can offer is the justification for trying drug treatment it cannot predict its efficacy.This argument can be followed in greater point in time in the earlier writings of CloningerEven when a dimension is concur (e.g. emotional unbalance as a core feature of borderline personality disorder) its definition may vary. Some see affective instability in terms of reward addiction, whereas others consider it as disinhibition. Which view is interpreted is of considerable importance when considering drug treatment. The author sees novelty-seeking as existence reso lute through genetic predisposition via the dopamine system, whereas many others consider affective disinhibition to be related to the serotonergic system. When no biological marker is linked distinctly to diagnosis answers can only be speculative. (Cloninger, C. R et al. 1993)2. TREATMENT BY CONVENTIONAL MEANS word by conventional means could be taken to include sundry(a) psychotherapeutic approaches. A landmark study by Chiesa and Fonagy compared the results of a one-stage treatment baby-sit (in-patient treatment with no later care) with a two-stage model (shorter in-patient admission followed by outreach therapy) in a large cohort of patients with antisocial personality disorder (and other psychopathies). The paper is both long and complex, but, in essence, those patients treated in the two stage model did significantly better in both global assessments of affable health as well as assessments of social adjustment.Many papers discover to treatment regimes which, although v arying in detail, tend to include divisions of a socio-therapeutic program which are generally managed primarily by the nursing staff, and a more than formal psychoanalytic psychotherapy programme which tends to be delivered by medical exam and non-medical psychotherapists. The latter typically tends to target psychodynamic orientation and typically focuses on the comment of the internal conflicts of the patient, as well as on the confrontation and elucidation of dysfunctional behaviour. It also will include analysis of institutional transferences as they become apparent during the treatment phase. (viz. Dolan, B et al. 2007)In very much the same way as we have observed in the context of pharmacological interventions, it would appear to be true that the literature relating to psychotherapeutic regimes suffers from difficulties internal in maintaining follow up and comparison of ostensibly similar trials because of the variations in both diagnosis and the nature of the sundry (a) treatment regimes.A number of sources place great tenseness on a holistic assessment of the patients full biography including their cognitive and affective levels of functioning. special(prenominal) attention should also be paid to the patients condemnable history if it is relevant (and it usually is) and to any available evidence of any previous behavioural disorder, including any associations such as attention deficit disorder. These factors will rely upon a combination of interviews, psychometric measures (including the MMPI scales, repertory grids and hares Psychopathy Checklist) and file information, in which records of social, psychiatric and criminal history can usually be found. (Soyka M 2000)In addition to all of this, treatment decisions may also need to be based on factors and information which has been obtained from any number of independent sources such as family members, motor lodge records and victims.Oldham states that an alpha element in treatment is as assessment of the degree to which the patient feels able to exert any control over the various aspects of their behavioural dysfunction as well as their own reaction to their perception of their antisocial activity and conduct. This latter element may have enquiry into a number of lifestyle factors such as deviate behaviour, including attitudes to self and others, interpersonal style and mettle shout out. (Oldham J M 2006)All of these factors will have a bearing on the particular therapeutic approach to be adopted as well as an assessment of the patients own intellectual abilities.Lamberg points out that an important element in achieving any degree of success in treatment is to come to a realistic agreement with the patient as to the what both the healthcare professionals and the patient can expect as a result of the treatment programme adopted. Unrealistic attitudes or expectations on the part of either party are lily to lead to disillusionment and treatment breakdown. (Lamberg L 2006)The picturesque details of the various treatment options are clearly beyond the background knowledge of this essay and therefore they will be presented in overview.Behaviour therapyThis guinea pig of approach effectively uses a mixture of acquisition theory and data-based psychology to the various maladaptions of the patients behaviour. The (now largely outdated) reasoning croup this approach is that the patient is regarded as having learned abnormal behaviour patterns by inappropriate conditioning through interactions between their environmental past and their occurrent environmental situations. (Gilligan J, et al. 2004). Clearly this is not referable to the various associated organic syndromes which may present as comorbidities. Behavioural therapists therefore start from the assumption that all these behavioural aberrations can be both predicted and controlled. Their goal is therefore to use externally derived stimuli to either weaken or completely eliminate any of the unwanted dysfunctional behaviour patterns. In clinical situations, the therapeutic effect is sought through the mechanism of either positive or banish reinforcement techniques which can strengthen or enhance the desired behaviour pattern or occasionally through punishment mechanisms which make it little likely.Robertson suggests that such techniques can be enhanced by the addition of other learning principles including avoidance, extinction, time-out, generalisation and discrimination (Robertson M R 2000)Aversion therapy appeared to be in vogue in the 1980s but is seldom used in current practice.Other facets of behaviour therapy include the adoption of skills educate where the patient learns appropriate responses to potentially aggressive encounters, the need to control anger, and the ability to deal with authority figures. (Kerr I B et al. 2007)Cognitive approachesThis appears to be a more frequently used approach in the modern literature. It involves identifying, confront ing and then questioning any maladaptive or irrational thoughts that the patient may have and establishing new cognitions to replace them. (Mack A H et al. 2003)The basic archecase tail this eccentric of approach is that the clinical problems which are responsive to this type of intervention are disorders of either thought or feeling processes which veer or even dictate or behaviour patterns. It follows that modification of these maladaptive thought processes will change the maladaptive behaviour patterns. (Evenden J 1999)The commonest lotion of this technique is therapeutic modelling whereby treatment allows the patient to observe a competent, coping model of humanbehaviour, and then embarking on a cognitive dissection in the hope that this will be reflected in the patients future conduct. It has been successfully used in situations of response to provocation, physiological monitoring, assertiveness training, reappraisal, cognitive self-control, relaxation training and self-in struction. Cognitive approaches can be undertaken in either a group or individual basis. (Toone B 2004) mortal and group psychotherapyThis approach differs from behavioural approaches (which focus primarily on externally observed behaviour patterns) insofar as it is primarily concern with approaching the patient in an empathetic notificationship which allows them to reach an ground of what is happening in their own personal inner worldFreud believed that patients could both share and explore the underlying causes of their clinical difficulties and learn to change the mental determinants through the process of experiencing of unrecognised forces in themselves. (Brown, D et al. 1979)In broad terms, a psychodynamic approach to the treatment of antisocial personality disorder places emphasis on the importance of personality structure and development, and is based upon the principle that antisocial behaviour is an expression of an underlying personality disturbance. Chronic antisocia l behaviour is held to reflect distortions in development and most particularly, the patients unrefined defences against trusting relationships. (Sugden S G et al. 2006)Patients with antisocial personality disorder typically show damage to their ego strength and therefore their capacity to film and manage various primitive anxieties and impulses. It follows therefore that a crucial part of psychotherapy is helping the patient to uncover the relevant mental states and meanings behind their behaviour patterns, and allowing them to explore and understand their feelings and maladaptive defence mechanisms. (Grossman L S et al. 1999)Therapeutic community approachesSome authorities advocate the use of the therapeutic community. This involves a more democratic engagement between healthcare professionals and patients and encourages the more active participation of patients in their own treatment in addition to giving them a greater responsibility for the day to day trial of their hospita l community. It is hoped that this delegation of responsibility to patients in a living and learning environment will help to encourage a more circularise expression of their feelings and a greater understanding and exploration of interpersonal relationships the lack of which is a major feature in antisocial personality disorder. The arranging and atmosphere in such a community is typically low key and fairly unstructured with regular meetings between the healthcare professionals and the patients. This type of approach is occasionally referred to in the literature as milieu therapy. The therapeutic structure is that the community allows for the provision of a combination of interventions such as pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, cognitive therapy, group therapy and behavioural therapy. All of these elements are delivered by a wide range of staff from different professional backgrounds, so that the various patients in the community can receive different treatment packages, depending on their individual needs. (Connor D F et al. 2003)3. ASSOCIATION OF ASPD WITH SUBSTANCE ABUSE other of the major themes apparent in the literature is the association of antisocial personality disorder with subject matter abuse. Part of the therapeutic regime should therefore include a direct approach to this element of the problem. It is known that the earlier the clinical manifestation of antisocial personality disorder (particularly at the age of 10 or younger) the greater is the risk of substance abuse in childish or adult life. (Joshi V et al. 2001)It has also been shown that the appointment with substance abuse prior to the instigation of treatment is a predictor of poor therapeutic outcome. (Myers W C et al. 2006)Studies which have attempted to quantify the association of antisocial personality disorder with substance abuse have, almost without exception, identified the element of deceit on the part of the patients as being a major source of unreliability in their finding s. Deceit is a commonly found behaviour pattern in antisocial personality disorder and the social stigma associated with substance abuse makes the apparent need for deceit on the part of the patient more understandable.Myers published a tour-de-force on the issues linking substance abuse and the adolescent with antisocial personality disorder. (Myers M G et al. 1998). A number of well constructed studies (viz. Windle M 2000) have stated that antisocial behaviour patterns diagnosed in children and adolescents are predictive of both adolescent and adult involvement in substance abuse with Robins going further and stating that conduct disorder (considered to be part of the same spectrum of conditions as antisocial personality disorder) is a strong prognostic indicator for both antisocial personality disorder and abuse of psychoactive substance in adulthood. (Robins L N et al. 2001). These observations have led a number of commentators to conclude that adult antisocial personality disor der and substance use disorders may share common etiologic pathways. This however, is rather speculative. There is some evidence that there may be a genetic link between the two but the situation should be regarded as not proven. The two elements are certainly linked but the nature of the linkage is unclear.The thrust of this theme can be considered further with the examination of an interesting viewpoint which is expressed by Fu (Fu. O et al. 2002) who was exploring the genetic background between antisocial personality disorder and alcohol dependency. The comments made in the Myers paper (cited above) relating to the possibility that antisocial personality disorder and substance abuse may have a common or related aetiology is given further credence by Fus work in which he cites evidence in studies by Kessler and others for separate increased genetic susceptibility to antisocial personality disorder, hemp dependence and alcohol dependence. Both marijuana dependence and alcohol dep endence have been found to be familial in some studies with monozygotic separated twins showing higher incidences than the normal population. (Kessler R C et al. 2006)Slutske suggests that common genetic risk factors have been suggested to account for between 76% and 71% of the genetic association between antisocial personality disorder and alcohol dependence in twin studies. (Slutske W S et al. 1998) a finding that was replicated in the True study showing the possibility of a genetic link between antisocial personality disorder, alcohol dependence and marijuana dependence. It should also be noted that the same study describe the presence of a statistically significant genetic link between antisocial personality disorder and major depression which is believed to also be linked to increased risk of alcohol dependence. (True W R et al. 1999)There is a disproportionately high prevalence of antisocial personality disorder amongst substance abusers. Those substance abusers who have anti social personality disorder are likely to have started abusing earlier than their non-affected counterparts. (Carroll K M et al. 2003) . Other authorities demonstrate a preponderance of polysubstance abusers in substance abusers who have antisocial personality disorder with the same studies showing worse prognostic outcomes in this sub-set. (Cacciola J S et al. 2005)If one considers the problem from a developmental viewpoint, some years ago Moffitt identified two distinct sub-types of deviance in adolescence. By far the largest group were those where the problem and challenging behaviour patterns commence and end before the end of adolescence. The second, much smaller group were those where the behaviour patterns persisted into adulthood. (Moffitt T E 1993). Studies which have attempted to further define these issues have suggested that early emergence of antisocial personality disorder (or conduct disorder in the child) together with a demonstration of these deviant behaviour patt erns crosswise a wide spectrum of settings are both good prognostic indicators of likely application of antisocial personality disorder and substance abuse into adult life. (Loeber R et al. 2003)Moffitt (who has written extensively on this issue) proposes the supposition of snares in which a number of features of the behaviour patterns of the antisocial personality disorder are diminutive in serving to limit options for the individual to escape their antisocial lifestyle. The concept that deeper commitment to drugs or alcohol may, in themselves, limit the escape options for pro-social behaviour or they may habituate the patient to environments which are more dubious in terms of relapse. Both of these mechanisms unfortunately serve to perpetuate a deviant or antisocial lifestyle.This concept can be considered further with the realisation that antisocial personality disorder and substance abuse expands into most of the major life domains. The problems that all sufferers with antis ocial personality disorder have in areas such as school or work, interpersonal relations, and intelligent difficulties, are greatly increased by the coexistence of a problem with substance abuse. All these areas are clearly important to the developing adolescent persona. This also is reflected in the fact that such high risk individuals increase their trouble further by indulging in substance abuse and this, in turn, is associated with an increased persistence of antisocial personality disorder into adult life. The persistence of symptoms into adult life in this sub-group can be viewed as being associated with the presence of additional psychopathology. In the words of MoffittThe substance abuse and emotional difficulties apparent in the group with antisocial personality disorder may well be reciprocally related in such a way that each serves to exacerbate the other. (Moffitt T E 1993)ReferencesBlack, D. A. (2002) A quin year follow up of male patients discharged from Broadmoor H ospital. In abnormal Offenders, Delinquency and the Criminal Justice System (eds. J. Gunn D. P. Farrington). Chichester WileyBrown, D. Pedder, J. (1979) Introduction to Psychotherapy An compend of Psychodynamic Practice. Principles and Practice. London RoutledgeCacciola J S, Alterman A I, Rutherford M J, Snider E C (2005) Treatment response of antisocial substance abusers. J Nerv Ment Dis 2005 183 166 171Carroll K M, Ball S A, Rounsaville B J (2003) A comparison of alternate systems for diagnosing antisocial personality disorder in cocaine abusers. J Nerv Ment Dis 1993 181 436 444Cleckley, H. (1964) The Mask of saneness (Forth ed.). United States Mosby 1964Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M. Pryzbeck, T. R. (1993) A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 975 990.Connor D F, R. Thomas Boone, Ronald J. Steingard, Ivan D. Lopez, and Richard H. Melloni, JR (2003) Psychopharmacology and Aggression II. A Meta-Analysis of Nonstim ulant Medication Effects on receptive Aggression-Related Behaviors in Youth with SED. ledger of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Fall 2003 11 157 168.Cowdry, R. Gardner, D. C. (1998) Pharmacotherapy of borderline personality disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 111 119Evenden J (1999) Impulsivity a word of clinical and experimental findings J Psychopharmacol, Jun 1999 13 180 192.Frank E, Jill M. Cyranowski, Paola Rucci, M. Katherine Shear, Andrea Fagiolini, Michael E. Thase, Giovanni B. Cassano, capital of Seychelles J. Grochocinski, Bryan Kostelnik, and David J. Kupfer (2002) Clinical Significance of Lifetime Panic Spectrum Symptoms in the Treatment of Patients With bipolar I Disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry, Oct 2002 59 905 911Fu. O Heath A C, Bucholtz K K, Nelson E et al. (2002) Shared Genetic Risk of Major Depression, Alcohol Dependence, and marihuana Dependence. Contribution of Antisocial Personality Disorder in Men. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 59 1125 1132.Gi lligan J, Lee B (2004) The Psychopharmacologic Treatment of Violent Youth. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., Dec 2004 1036 356 381.Grossman L S, Brian Martis, and Christopher G. Fichtner (1999) be Sex Offenders Treatable? A Research Overview. Psychiatr Serv, Mar 1999 50 349 361.Gunderson J G, Igor Weinberg, female horse T. Daversa, Karsten D. Kueppenbender, Mary C. Zanarini, M. Tracie Shea, Andrew E. Skodol, Charles A. Sanislow, Shirley Yen, Leslie C. Morey, Carlos M. Grilo, Thomas H. McGlashan, Robert L. Stout, and Ingrid Dyck (2006) Descriptive and Longitudinal Observations on the Relationship of minimum Personality Disorder and Bipolar Disorder. Am J Psychiatry, Jul 2006 163 1173 1178.Hodgins S, Alderton J, Cree A, Aboud A, Mak T (2007) hard-hitting behaviour, victimisation and crime among severely mentally ill patients requiring hospitalisation. The British Journal of Psychiatry, October 1, 2007 191(4) 343 350.Hudziak J J, TJ Boffeli, JJ Kreisman, MM Battaglia, C Stanger, SB Guze , and JJ Kriesman JJ (2006) Clinical study of the relation of borderline personality disorder to Briquets syndrome (hysteria), somatization disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and substance abuse disorders Am J Psychiatry, Dec 1996 153 1598 1606.Kerr I B, Taylor D, (2007) Acute disturbed or violent behaviour principles of treatment. J Psychopharmacol, 1997 11 271 277.Kessler R C, Nelson C B, McGonagle K A, Edlund M J, Frank R G, Leaf P J. (2006) The epidemiology of co-occurring addictive and mental disorders implications for prevention and service utilization. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2006 66 17 31.Lamberg L (2006) Personality Disorder a Possibility in Problem Patients, Specialists Say. JAMA, kinsfolk 2006 296 1341 1342Loeber R, Wung P, Keenan K, Giroux B, Stouthamer-Loeber M, Van Kammen W, Maughan B (2003) developmental pathways in disruptive child behavior. Developmental Psychopathology 2003 5 103 133Mack A H, Frances R J (2003) Substance-Related Disorders. Focus, foun tain 2003 1 125 146.Martens W H J (2000) Antisocial and insane Personality Disorders Causes, Course, and RemissionA revolutions per minuteiew Article. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, August 1, 2000 44 (4) 406 430.Moffitt T E (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev 1993 100 674 701Myers M G, Stewart D G, Brown S A (1998) cash advance From Conduct Disorder to Antisocial Personality Disorder Following Treatment for Adolescent Substance Abuse Am J Psychiatry clv 479 485, April 1998Myers W C, Burket R C, Husted D S (2006) Sadistic personality disorder and comorbid mental illness in adolescent psychiatric inpatients. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, January 1, 2006 34 (1) 61 71.Oldham J M (2006) boundary line Personality Disorder and Suicidality. Am J Psychiatry, Jan 2006 163 20 26.Paris J (2005) Borderline personality disorder. Can. Med. Assoc. J., Jun 2005 172 1579 1583.Robertson M R (2000) Tourette syn drome, associated conditions and the complexities of treatment. Brain, Mar 2000 123 425 462.Robins L N, Price R K (2001) Adult disorders predicted by childhood conduct problems results from the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment sports stadium project. Psychiatry 2001 54 116 132Slutske W S, Heath A C, Dinwiddie S H, madden P A, Bucholz K K, Dunne M P, Statham D , Martin N G. (1998) Common genetic risk factors for conduct disorder and AD. J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 107 363 374.Soyka M (2000) Substance misuse, psychiatric disorder and violent and disturbed behaviour. The British Journal of Psychiatry, Apr 2000 176 345 350.Sugden S G, Kile S J, Hendren R L (2006) Neurodevelopmental Pathways to Aggression A Model to Understand and guide Treatment in Youth. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, Aug 2006 18 302 317.Toone B (2004) Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adulthood. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, Apr 2004 75 523 525.Turgay A, Carin Binder, Richard Snyder, and Sandra Fisman (2002) Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Risperidone for the Treatment of Disruptive Behavior Disorders in Children With Subaverage Iqs. Pediatrics, Sep 2002 110 e 34.Tyrer P and Anthony W. Bateman (2004) Drug treatment for personality disorders. Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., Sep 2004 10 389 398.Windle M (2000) A longitudinal study of antisocial behaviors in early adolescence as predictors of late adolescent substance use gender and ethnic group differences. J Abnorm Psychol 2000 99 86 912.8.08 Word count 4,757 PDG